Evaluation questionnaire

Showing all results. 6 results total.
#sort iconSubmittedUserIP AddressBasic informationUse of development toolsText editor + GF shellGF Eclipse plug-inCloud-based IDEOther development toolCompilation diagnosticsOther compilation diagnostic methodGrammar display modes (examples below)Tools for generation and testingOther method for treebanksOther method for generation and testing in generalResource grammar toolsStarting point for your grammarBased on formal systemOther starting point for your grammarBasic unit of the grammarParagraph or more: why?Semantic controlModule structureOther module structureConcrete syntaxComments / explanations for concrete syntaxOther comments
435 Feb 2013 - 17:35inari.listenmaa128.214.199.71Phrasebook Spanish concrete syntax (I'm answering to other questions for Phrasebook, although I didn't write the abstract syntax) Hammurabi codex, abstract syntax + English and Akkadian concrete syntaxes Akkadian (slightly extended) mini resource and part of Chinese mini resource Spanish and English 2, Chinese and Akkadian 0, GF 2 Text editor + GF shell
GF-Eclipse plug-in
Kate, Ubuntu 10.04 jEdit, Windows 7 Smallish scale, application grammar / mini resourceJust to test. Windows 7. Didn't work that well, decided to use text editor and GF shell.OtherHaha forgot to add a "none" field. Well, none.compute_concrete (cc)Treebanks
...with a shellscript?
...manually?
Random generation
RGL synopsis document
Download the source files and read them
...because other documentation was not helpful
...no, it was, but I'm just a GF nerd
Library browser grammar to construct RGL expressions
Test corpus of sentences you want to express in the grammar
...and uses the test corpus as a documentation for the abstract syntax
SentenceSimple, restrictive abstract syntaxCommon constructions with a functorlincats only from recommended RGL API categories
lincats from categories that you have created yourself (see example below)
...I use a type synonym and a special constructor
Only API-level functions (ParadigmsXxx, SyntaxXxx) -- no tables, no concatenation, no MorphoXxx opers.
4221 Jan 2013 - 13:15Kaarel.Kaljurand87.64.179.118Language skills: Estonian (3), English (2), German (1) GF skills: medium skills (2) I've been working on the ACE-in-GF grammar, see: https://github.com/Attempto/ACE-in-GF Text editor + GF shellVim, Make, various Unix command line tools, Ubuntu Grammar size: 15 languages, 50 cats, 100 funs (excluding the lexicon)verbose (import -v FILE)print_grammar (pg)
pg -words
pg -missing
compute_concrete (cc)
...with a shellscript?
...manually?
Random generation
Other way of grammar testing
Used an existing AceWiki treebank that can be parsed with AceWiki's own Codeco parser. Tried to parse this with the ACE-in-GF grammar.1. Exhaustive generation based on increasing sentence length obtained by completion. First removed less interesting parts of the grammar to make the output manageable. (This is still work in progress.) 2. Roundtripping to discover ambiguities, i.e. for each tree in a treebank, linearize+parse it with all the languages. Highlight cases where "linearize+parse" produces new trees, where highlight == linearize the original tree and the new trees in a disambiguation language (e.g. ACE). This helps to discover errors like: if X sees somebody who sees Y ... -> if X sees somebody who Y sees ... (word order changes, in Ger and Dut)RGL synopsis document
RGL source browser
Download the source files and read them
...because other documentation was not helpful
Test corpus of sentences you want to express in the grammar
...and used the test corpus as a treebank later on
Abstract syntax based on an existing formal system
AceWiki subset of ACEParagraph or moreIn ACE, the basic unit is a paragraph, which consists of anaphorically linked sentences. Even though the ACE-in-GF grammar does not model the anaphoric links, it still makes sense to have a Paragraph category to combine the sentences.No semantic control in abstract syntaxBase module and domain-specific extensions
Common constructions with a functor
lincats only from recommended RGL API categories The work on ACE-in-GF is documented in D11.1. The latest version of the grammar, test scripts, and a more recent version of the deliverable can be found on https://github.com/Attempto/ACE-in-GF
417 Jan 2013 - 19:12johnj.camilleri88.203.13.151ACE-in-GF, Resource grammar for Maltese Language skills: 3 GF skills: 3Text editor + GF shell
GF-Eclipse plug-in
Cloud-based IDE
Emacs (with GF major mode) Ubuntu 12 RGL-scaleUbuntu 12 Small scale (food grammars)Used just to check it out. I think it may be helpful to those learning GF, but in my case it was not helpful. I found it frustrating not being able to "free-type"Othergf --tagspg -words
pg -missing
abstract_info (ai)
show_opers (so)
compute_concrete (cc)
Treebanks
...with a shellscript?
...manually?
RGL synopsis document
RGL source browser
Download the source files and read them
...no, it was, but I'm just a GF nerd
Library browser grammar to construct RGL expressions
Test corpus of sentences you want to express in the grammar
...and used the test corpus as a treebank later on
SentenceNo semantic control in abstract syntaxCommon constructions with a functorlincats from categories that you have created yourself (see example below)
...I use a type synonym and a special constructor
Only API-level functions (ParadigmsXxx, SyntaxXxx) -- no tables, no concatenation, no MorphoXxx opers.
407 Jan 2013 - 16:24jordi.saludes147.83.83.252Application grammars: Part of the mgl library, abstracts of the mgl/sage library, the grammar inside mgl/wproblems. Resource grammars: Part of the Cat. Cat: 3, Spa: 3, Fre: 2, Eng: 2, Ger: 1. GF: 3 Text editor + GF shell
Cloud-based IDE
Other, specify later
Vim, Sublime Text. Mac OS X, Linux Ubuntu. wproblems: 1726 lines, all mgl: 19737 linesTried it when not having GF available because of the syntax checkingI used to write GF code in Apple Xcode developement suite. Then, they changed how you define syntax coloring for a new language and it's not really well documented anymoreverbose (import -v FILE)print_grammar (pg)
compute_concrete (cc)
Treebanks
...other method, specify later
I developed ad-hoc code in haskell to store, edit and show differences in treebanks.RGL synopsis document
RGL source browser
Download the source files and read them
...because other documentation was not helpful
Test corpus of sentences you want to express in the grammar
Abstract syntax based on an existing formal system
Code in Prolog developed simultaneously with GF.SentenceNo semantic control in abstract syntax
...but with external control
Base module and domain-specific extensions
Common constructions with a functor
...functor only for the concrete syntax of the base grammar?
lincats only from recommended RGL API categories
lincats from categories that you have created yourself (see example below)
...I use a type synonym and a special constructor
397 Jan 2013 - 14:48Shafqat.Virk129.16.191.37Urdu, Hindi, Punjabi, Persian, Sindhi, Nepali Language Skills: 3,2,3,1,1,0 (in the order of languages) GF Skills: 3Text editor + GF shellKomo Editverbose (import -v FILE)print_grammar (pg)
pg -missing
abstract_info (ai)
compute_concrete (cc)
Treebanks
...manually?
Random generation
RGL synopsis document
Download the source files and read them
Test corpus of sentences you want to express in the grammar
...and used the test corpus as a treebank later on
SentenceNo semantic control in abstract syntaxBase module and domain-specific extensions
Common constructions with a functor
lincats only from recommended RGL API categories
3829 Oct 2012 - 16:56aarne.ranta129.16.225.78Text editor + GF shell
GF-Eclipse plug-in
Cloud-based IDE
Other, specify later
Emacs, mac os, ubuntu linuxUbuntu linuxas demo and tutorialHaskell and shell scripts generating grammarsverbose (import -v FILE)
Other
print_grammar (pg)
pg -words
pg -missing
abstract_info (ai)
show_opers (so)
compute_concrete (cc)
Treebanks
...with Eclipse plug-in?
...with a shellscript?
...manually?
Random generation
...with weights?
Other way of grammar testing
RGL synopsis document
RGL source browser
Download the source files and read them
...because other documentation was not helpful
...no, it was, but I'm just a GF nerd
Library browser grammar to construct RGL expressions
Test corpus of sentences you want to express in the grammar
...and used the test corpus as a treebank later on
...and uses the test corpus as a documentation for the abstract syntax
Abstract syntax based on an existing formal system
Other method of abstract syntax design
an existing BNF grammarParagraph or moreNo semantic control in abstract syntax
...but with external control
Simple, restrictive abstract syntax
Dependent types
Base module and domain-specific extensions
Common constructions with a functor
...functor in all levels of your grammar?
...functor only for the concrete syntax of the base grammar?
Other type of module structure
lincats only from recommended RGL API categories
...I have base grammar and domain extensions, where "hard to understand" categories are hidden and only easy ones visible in domain extensions
lincats from non-recommended categories: lexical or structural
...but it's only monolingual application, no need to worry about crosslingual problems
...I have other reason and will specify
lincats from categories that you have created yourself (see example below)
...I use a type synonym and a special constructor
...I have base grammar and domain extensions, constructor hidden in the base part
Only API-level functions (ParadigmsXxx, SyntaxXxx) -- no tables, no concatenation, no MorphoXxx opers.