Evaluation questionnaire
| Q | responses | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Basic information | |||||||||
| Left Blank | 0 | |||||||||
| User entered value | 5 | |||||||||
| Average submission length in words (ex blanks) | 24.20 | |||||||||
| 2 | Use of development tools | |||||||||
| Text editor + GF shell | 6 | |||||||||
| GF-Eclipse plug-in | 3 | |||||||||
| Cloud-based IDE | 3 | |||||||||
| Other, specify later | 2 | |||||||||
| 3 | Text editor + GF shell | |||||||||
| Left Blank | 0 | |||||||||
| User entered value | 6 | |||||||||
| Average submission length in words (ex blanks) | 8.83 | |||||||||
| 4 | GF Eclipse plug-in | |||||||||
| Left Blank | 3 | |||||||||
| User entered value | 3 | |||||||||
| Average submission length in words (ex blanks) | 7.67 | |||||||||
| 5 | Cloud-based IDE | |||||||||
| Left Blank | 3 | |||||||||
| User entered value | 3 | |||||||||
| Average submission length in words (ex blanks) | 16.33 | |||||||||
| 6 | Other development tool | |||||||||
| Left Blank | 4 | |||||||||
| User entered value | 2 | |||||||||
| Average submission length in words (ex blanks) | 18.00 | |||||||||
| 7 | Compilation diagnostics | |||||||||
| verbose (import -v FILE) | 4 | |||||||||
| Other | 3 | |||||||||
| 8 | Other compilation diagnostic method | |||||||||
| Left Blank | 4 | |||||||||
| User entered value | 2 | |||||||||
| Average submission length in words (ex blanks) | 5.50 | |||||||||
| 9 | Grammar display modes (examples below) | |||||||||
| print_grammar (pg) | 4 | |||||||||
| pg -words | 3 | |||||||||
| pg -missing | 4 | |||||||||
| abstract_info (ai) | 3 | |||||||||
| show_opers (so) | 2 | |||||||||
| compute_concrete (cc) | 6 | |||||||||
| 10 | Tools for generation and testing | |||||||||
| Treebanks | 5 | |||||||||
| ...with Eclipse plug-in? | 1 | |||||||||
| ...with a shellscript? | 4 | |||||||||
| ...manually? | 5 | |||||||||
| ...other method, specify later | 1 | |||||||||
| Random generation | 4 | |||||||||
| ...with weights? | 1 | |||||||||
| Other way of grammar testing | 2 | |||||||||
| 11 | Other method for treebanks | |||||||||
| Left Blank | 4 | |||||||||
| User entered value | 2 | |||||||||
| Average submission length in words (ex blanks) | 18.00 | |||||||||
| 12 | Other method for generation and testing in general | |||||||||
| Left Blank | 5 | |||||||||
| User entered value | 1 | |||||||||
| Average submission length in words (ex blanks) | 101.00 | |||||||||
| 13 | Resource grammar tools | |||||||||
| RGL synopsis document | 6 | |||||||||
| RGL source browser | 4 | |||||||||
| Download the source files and read them | 6 | |||||||||
| ...because other documentation was not helpful | 4 | |||||||||
| ...no, it was, but I'm just a GF nerd | 3 | |||||||||
| Library browser grammar to construct RGL expressions | 3 | |||||||||
| 14 | Starting point for your grammar | |||||||||
| Test corpus of sentences you want to express in the grammar | 6 | |||||||||
| ...and used the test corpus as a treebank later on | 4 | |||||||||
| ...and uses the test corpus as a documentation for the abstract syntax | 2 | |||||||||
| Abstract syntax based on an existing formal system | 3 | |||||||||
| Other method of abstract syntax design | 1 | |||||||||
| 15 | Based on formal system | |||||||||
| Left Blank | 3 | |||||||||
| User entered value | 3 | |||||||||
| Average submission length in words (ex blanks) | 5.00 | |||||||||
| 16 | Other starting point for your grammar | |||||||||
| Left Blank | 6 | |||||||||
| User entered value | 0 | |||||||||
| Average submission length in words (ex blanks) | 0 | |||||||||
| 17 | Basic unit of the grammar | |||||||||
| Sentence | 4 | |||||||||
| Paragraph or more | 2 | |||||||||
| 18 | Paragraph or more: why? | |||||||||
| Left Blank | 5 | |||||||||
| User entered value | 1 | |||||||||
| Average submission length in words (ex blanks) | 38.00 | |||||||||
| 19 | Semantic control | |||||||||
| No semantic control in abstract syntax | 5 | |||||||||
| ...but with external control | 2 | |||||||||
| Simple, restrictive abstract syntax | 2 | |||||||||
| Dependent types | 1 | |||||||||
| 20 | Module structure | |||||||||
| Base module and domain-specific extensions | 4 | |||||||||
| Common constructions with a functor | 6 | |||||||||
| ...functor in all levels of your grammar? | 1 | |||||||||
| ...functor only for the concrete syntax of the base grammar? | 2 | |||||||||
| Other type of module structure | 1 | |||||||||
| 21 | Other module structure | |||||||||
| Left Blank | 6 | |||||||||
| User entered value | 0 | |||||||||
| Average submission length in words (ex blanks) | 0 | |||||||||
| 22 | Concrete syntax | |||||||||
| lincats only from recommended RGL API categories | 5 | |||||||||
| ...I have base grammar and domain extensions, where "hard to understand" categories are hidden and only easy ones visible in domain extensions | 1 | |||||||||
| lincats from non-recommended categories: lexical or structural | 1 | |||||||||
| ...but it's only monolingual application, no need to worry about crosslingual problems | 1 | |||||||||
| ...I have other reason and will specify | 1 | |||||||||
| lincats from categories that you have created yourself (see example below) | 4 | |||||||||
| ...I use a type synonym and a special constructor | 4 | |||||||||
| ...I have base grammar and domain extensions, constructor hidden in the base part | 1 | |||||||||
| Only API-level functions (ParadigmsXxx, SyntaxXxx) -- no tables, no concatenation, no MorphoXxx opers. | 3 | |||||||||
| 23 | Comments / explanations for concrete syntax | |||||||||
| Left Blank | 5 | |||||||||
| User entered value | 0 | |||||||||
| Average submission length in words (ex blanks) | 0 | |||||||||
| 24 | Other comments | |||||||||
| Left Blank | 4 | |||||||||
| User entered value | 1 | |||||||||
| Average submission length in words (ex blanks) | 33.00 | |||||||||
What links here
No backlinks found.
