Evaluations

1 Jun 2011
30 Jun 2012
Europe/Vienna
ID: 
7.8
Workpackage: 
Case Study: Patents
Assignees: 
aarne.ranta
Assignees: 
maria.mateva
Assignees: 
meritxell.gonzalez
Relevant Deliverables: 
Patent Case Study Final Report
Status: 
Planned

DEPENDENCIES:

  • TASK 5

Note: Deadlines have been delayed 3 months due to the WP delay.

DEADLINE: M31 (to allow for final report)

Subtasks

  • Preparation starts M19 (at the very latest)
  • Hiring translators
  • Producing guidelines for translators
  • Full evaluation starts at latest M28
    • Evaluation will make use of the TAUS criteria






TAUS Evaluation Criteria:

  • Excellent (4):
    • Accurately transfers all info; correct terminology, correct grammar. Understanding not improved by reading the source text.
  • Good (3):
    • Contains minor mistakes; would not need to refer to source text to correct the mistakes.
  • Medium (2):
    • Significant errors in output. Would need to read the source text to correct the errors.
  • Poor (1):
    • Serious errors in output. Would need to read the source text to understand the output. Would probably need to retranslate from scratch.